Wednesday, December 2, 2009

12/2/2009 class discussion


our favorite words from this weeks reading:
-air-conditioning as a uniting force
-ac has launched the endless building...calarts...?
-junk space doodddd
-ralphs in castaic...arcs as ornatmentation>>>>welcome to your marketplace HOW EURO
-orphan particles
-amorphous crotches of the new generation
-leather boots as pedestals for the body

susanna, yelena, alanna, sarah
<3
say hi to the babyyyy!
yayyyy



YAY KEN! Happy birthday little Lena!!!!!!

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Scedule update

We will not be having class next week, 11/25. (Happy Thanksgiving)
I will post questions related to the reading and I'd like everyone to post a longer blog post than usual since we are not meeting. You can also use the time we'd normally be spending in class to work on your research project.
The final Presentation schedule is as follows:

12/9:
Chistopher Morabito
Masato Nakada
Piper Hughes
David Rhodes
Alanna Martinez
Sahba Motallebi
Curtis Mueller
Lauren Wemischner

12/16:
Devon Greenbaum
Vanessa Torrez
Will Marsh
Michael Enggelbreit
Susanna Battin
Yelena Zhelezov
Sarah Merkle

If you aren't scheduled to a presentation or have any questions, please e-mail me. Thanks!

links from today's discussion

Diller and Sofidio - We focused on Para-site, Tourisms, Bad Press, American Lawn, The Blur Building and The Eyebeam proposal.
Rem Koohas' Office of Metropolitan Architecture - esp. the early unbuilt work, the seattle public library and China's CCTV building in Bejing.
Interview with Vito Acconci
Jim Isermann
Jorge Pardo
Rachel Whiteread on House

Monday, November 16, 2009

The Could - London 2012


I saw this the other day and thought that this project definitely fit the theme of the class- it is both currently unbuilt and farout. From the website: "The Cloud serves as a tribute to a digital age of bits and atoms beyond the antiquity of steel and glass – a structure which reveals the connected networks of a common humanity fuelling the Olympics, their 2012 host city, and the world itself. The Cloud proposes a new form of monument – a new form of collective expression and experience, and an updated symbol of our modern age. It proposes an entirely new form of observation deck, high above the Olympics – one from which one can not only see the whole of London, but the whole of the world, immersed in the euphoric gusts of weather and world data."


Besides serving as an observational platform and a display of aggregate information pulled from around the world, The Cloud serves as an uplifting take on the spirit of the Olympics, a worldly optimism that attempts to connect elements of humanity and show just how small and networked the earth really is.



One interesting aspect of The Cloud is how it is funded. The creators of the project envision everyone from around the world being able to contribute to the Cloud - whether through the admission charges and bodily presence of their visit, or by their contributions towards a particular sphere and their ownership of a single LED. It is a internet inspired collaborative effort that ties into the spirit of a global community The Cloud so strongly represents.


Architects: Carlo Ratti, Walter Nicolino, Alex Haw Graphic Designers: Studio FM Milano Landscape Architects: Agence Ter Artist: Tomas Saraceno Structural Engineers: Schlaich Bergermann und Partner

Google, ARUP, GMJ, Umberto Eco, Marco Santambrogio, Chris Bangle, Giuliano da Empoli, Antoni Muntadas, William J, Mitchell, Paul Richens, Gianluca Salvatori, Caterina Ginzburg, Liza Fior, Margo Miller


Website:

Thursday, November 12, 2009

photos from our architectural endeavors...

incorporate/validate


note the matching jackets.

transaction/inversion
hospitality/security


open city/open road

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Late breaking questions on the Valparaiso School

Some questions to write about or at least consider for discussion before class tomorrow:

How is the concept of Amereida important to the Valparaiso school?
What is the Open City and why was it given that title?
How does walking and movement figure into the histroy of the Valparaiso group?

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Archigram

For this week's blog response, please choose one of the Archigram projects described in words and images in the article and briefly reflect on the form and content of the work.

Monday, October 12, 2009

Questions for Superstudio Readings

1. Superstudio seemed eager to throw out every convention that they associated with Modern architecture. Why?

2. Describe some of the political and economic circumstances in Florence that created the environment out of which Superstudio emerged.

3. What are some of the ideas behind the "Continuous Monument"?

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Two general questions related to this weeks reading.

In 'Toward a Theory of Normative Architecture,' what does Ockman mean by normative or 'major' architecture? Explain.

Compare and contrast Ockman's evaluation of the criticism of Tafuri and Grassi. What does each suggest architecture ought to do?

takes on Modernism

This week in class we focused on the work of Mies Van der Rohe and looked at some other Modernists... including LeCorbusier. If you'd like to follow up on the article I mentioned in class about the evolution of a Modernist housing project, you can find the link here.
I would also encourage everyone to look at this article which talks about the relative success and failure of Brasilia.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Mies Van Der Rohe Reading Response

In Hays article on Mies Van Der Rohe, there is a comparison of his work as lying directly between a dichotomy of pre-existing beliefs about architecture. On one side, architecture was viewed as a product of culture which reflected and glorified the dominant aspects of the time/space it inhabited. On the other, architecture was a purist practice of form, where the architect looked to create a work that directly referred to itself and only itself, instead of originating from historical references.
In the metropolis of the early 1900's, and indeed still today (although less pronounced), there was an overwhelming sense of diaspora and confusion as the new inhabitants of cities were bombarded from all sides with sound and visual stimuli. Many felt disconnected from their realm of culture, which can be seen in Dadaism. Gerog Simmel titled this affect nervenlebn,which produced a distinct sense of apathy and distanced attitude in citizens of metropolis cities. Van der Rohe created a building which, instead of imposing itself on the passerby, occupied its space quietly and reflected the surroundings. This created a silence and calm within a chaotic world.
Van der Rohe's building were all intended to be somewhat similar, although customized slightly to their locations. Because they generally reflected or absorbed their surroundings, they would always be participants in the current culture, always contemporary, always functional. The idea of the historical reference could be traced via a history of Van der Rohe's process and influences, but the buildings themselves seek to escape from such scrutiny.
In a departure from his general design of skyscrapers, the Barcelona Pavilion moves to the horizontal, using a variety of materials, beyond the usual glass, to create a freeflowing area. Materials reflect and mesh into each other, and provide the interpreter with a centerless, directionless area to explore as it seems natural. It is less about reflected the surroundings and more about exploring interior space within itself.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Questions for Hays reading

Some discussion questions for this week:

How does Hays differentiate between the notion of architecture as an instrument of culture and architecture as an "autonomous form?"

How does Hays relate the concept of Nervenleben from Simmel to the realm of architecture?

How does Hays differentiate between Mies' Barcelona Pavilion and the earlier more vertical work?

Also, I noticed that the reader has cut off bits of the text. If you're having trouble you can find a PDF here.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

week one


Here's the diagram we discussed in class today. It's from a David Harvey essay entitled Space as a Key word.
We also looked at the work of Mies Van Der Rohe, Norman Bel Geddes, El Lizzitsky, Rudolf Schindler, Yona Friedman, Buckminster Fuller, Bruce Goff, Frank Lloyd Wright, Ernest Burden, Paolo Soleri, Bernard Tschumi, and Zaha Hadid.

class blog

This blog is the discussion site for a calarts class taught by Ken Ehrlich. Each week I will post discussion questions related to the readings. Please respond within the comment section of the post as a way to keep the blog relatively coherent organizationally.